Im happy observe eHarmony responding in their formal web log to a write-up called “Marriage-Maker states tend to be Tied in Knots ” from the Wall Street diary. The WSJ post examines many matrimony stats released by internet dating sites like eHarmony along with the strategy always calculate such research. We chatted somewhat relating to this topic as well, a couple of weeks ago if the initial WSJ post was printed (see tale).
The WSJ article did not expect kindly from the stats circulated by dating sites, and for the most component I concur with the writer. Individuals needs to understand exactly how these data tend to be produced. Of all adult meet sites dating sites discussed inside the WSJ post, “eHarmony stands apart as among a lot more cautious people”. This isn’t exactly a glowing report for eHarmony very, they decided to upload a response on the blog site.
Inside eHarmony post they go into more information on the way they calculated that their own dating internet site was in charge of 2per cent of marriages in the us, through the 12-month duration closing March 2007. All of the info we already realized about from a previously launched PDF file named “eHarmony | Harris involved 2007 wedding Metrics few eHarmony Marriages” (see tale), although article really does cleanse some more details. What this blog post does tv series is, eHarmony is wanting to get as open and clear employing research results that you can. I think title “Open Communication” may certainly be the ideal choice the official eHarmony blog.
Here is the full eHarmony a reaction to the Wall Street diary about how precisely they determine their particular wedding stats. For further information on this dating site, read the report on eHarmony.